PubPol 495 is open to students in the Public Policy BA program, by permission only.
Classic economics is based on the idea of rational actors, people making decisions that maximize their own utility based on their preferences. However, most psychological models of behavior don't assume that people are particularly rational. Some even claim that the vast majority of our decisions are not based on conscious preferences and deliberate choices, but are instead influenced by factors that are invisible to us. For example, why is that people who are desperately trying to save money end up splurging on unnecessary purchases? How is that people who don't think of themselves as racist and even go out of their way to reject racist beliefs can still act in biased ways against racial minorities? Why is it so often the case that the arguments we remember best are the ones that happen to fit with our existing beliefs?
Many psychological and behavioral economic models have been created to explain the myriad ways that people act irrationally. In this policy seminar, we will examine some of the ways in which people are predictably irrational and the implications of this irrationality for policy. We will review research from behavioral economics and psychology to explore how factors such as heuristics, implicit attitudes, social norms, self-serving biases, and emotions can shape our decisions often in ways we're not even aware of. Assignments include four short policy memos that include peer review, and one longer policy memo on a topic of the student’s choice.
