Essay Contest: The Nixon Pardon: A Study in Integrity | Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
 
International Policy Center Home Page
 
 
WHAT WE DO NEWS & EVENTS PEOPLE OPPORTUNITIES WEISER DIPLOMACY CENTER
 

Essay Contest: The Nixon Pardon: A Study in Integrity

October 8, 2024

This essay, written by Kelly Rogers Victor, MPP '24, was awarded first prize in the Ford50 essay contest.

As we commemorate the 50th anniversary of Gerald Ford’s inauguration, we are invited  to reflect upon his legacy. No decision Ford made drew more attention than that to pardon  Richard Nixon. The pardon was widely reviled at the time, and then-director of the ACLU,  Aryeh Neier, went so far as to comment that had Ford’s logic been invoked at Nuremberg, the  Nazi leaders would have been exonerated and only their underlings left to face trial.i

Yet, despite the harsh rhetoric he faced, history has been kind to Ford. Republicans and  Democrats alike have since praised him for “integrity,” “decency,” and “selfless dedication,”ii and as having been an “outstanding statesman [who] wisely chose the path of healing during a  deeply divisive time.”iii During Edward Kennedy’s presentation of the JFK Profile in Courage  award to Ford in 2001, Kennedy cited Ford’s “courage and dedication” and conceded that despite  his own earlier opposition to the pardon, “time has a way of clarifying past events, and now we  see that President Ford was right.”iv

What was it that became so obvious in hindsight that so few were able to identify at the  time? 

When Ford took office in 1974, the country was roiling in domestic and foreign policy  crises—the aftermath of Watergate and erosion of public trust in government; “stagflation”—a  paralyzing trifecta of slow growth, high inflation, and high unemployment; the OPEC oil  embargo and soaring energy prices and gas shortages; the fall of Saigon and aftermath of the  Vietnam War; ongoing Cold War tensions; and violent conflicts in Africa, Cyprus, and elsewhere.  Against this backdrop, he faced the unique responsibility of deciding whether to make a  disgraced, former US president stand trial—a decision involving an agonizing set of competing  values: that of upholding the rule of law and restoring public trust, on the one hand, and of  healing a traumatized and polarized nation, on the other. A nearly impossible choice. What was a  president to do? 

Consider Ford’s deliberation as he later described it in his “Remarks on Signing a  Proclamation Granting Pardon to Richard Nixon”, in which we observe a thoughtful process  involving four elements.v First, an attempt at objectivity by employing his “customary policy” of  careful attention to facts and the seeking out of trusted counsel. Second, identification of his own  “personal sympathy”; private sentiments were something he “dare not depend on”. Third, an  assessment of his duty, stemming here from his dual obligations to the American public and, as a  human being, to his own conscience. Fourth, determination to the best of his ability of the likely  consequences of his decision. After an agonizing deliberation during which he eschewed “public  opinion polls to tell me what is right,” Ford at last made his decision. And once he did, he  assumed full responsibility for whatever would ensue: “the buck stops here.”

Ford appreciated that there truly was no “right” answer, and, indeed, there is often no  “right” answer in situations requiring moral or political decision-making. But, and this is one  reason the pardon remains so relevant today, the public doesn’t necessarily need the right answer.  What it needs is the right process—that is, assurance that those making decisions on its behalf do  so thoughtfully and with integrity, as Ford plainly did. It needs leaders who, when faced with  critical decisions, take their own deliberation seriously, understand its moral import, and move

slowly, taking pains about the process even, and especially, when the outcome is uncertain— which, almost all of the time, it is. 

Political decision-making today can feel, like so many other things, too quick and easy.  Our society runs on easy thought (AI), easy outrage (clickbait); easy friendships (Facebook);  easy money (the Fed); easy food (McDonald’s)—easy just about everything. Ford’s pardon  serves as a counterweight. We can debate whether his decision led to the best possible outcome,  but we cannot fail to be moved by the thoughtfulness, integrity, and difficulty of his deliberation.  These are the things for which he is remembered and respected. 

The pardon offers a second lesson. It is commonplace to bemoan the hatred and vitriol  that characterize modern politics. “How could you?” we shriek on X. But how different would it  be were we to slow down and ask, rather, “How did you?” By which would be meant: how did  you arrive at that conclusion? Which ideas, values and principles entered your mind as you  formulated your view? Because it’s possible you started with concerns that aren’t that so  different from my own, but from which we drew different conclusions. Process is the middle  ground where we can have that conversation. When we bypass straight to easy, should we be  surprised to find little common ground, dialogue, or mutual respect? Ideas feel cheap and  unsatisfying and only rouse our anger. 

Fifty years is an eternity in politics, yet Ford’s pardon displayed a timeless wisdom and  ethos that could go a long way toward restoring our own lost trust in our government institutions  and the healing of our body politic. Ford’s thoughtful reflection on Nixon’s pardon left a legacy  of an enduring reminder that integrity of process matters just as much, if not more, than the  outcome itself.

i Schmeck, H. (1974, September 9). Reaction to Pardon of Nixon is Divided, but Not Entirely Along Party  Lines. The New York Times.

iiBush, G. W. (2007). Commemorating Gerald R. Ford, Thirty-eighth President of the United States. Retrieved from  https://georgewbush

whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/bushrecord/documents/Selected_Speeches_George_W_Bush.pdf iii Statement from Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter on the Death of President Gerald Ford. Retrieved from  https://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/ford_122706.html

iv Clymer, Adam. (2001, May 22). Ford Wins Kennedy Award For “Courage” of Nixon Pardon. The New York  Times.

v Ford, Gerald R. (1974). President Gerald R. Ford's Remarks on Signing a Proclamation Granting Pardon to  Richard Nixon. Key Speeches and Writings of Gerald R. Ford. https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/the fords/gerald-r-ford/key-speeches-and-writings-gerald-r-ford